Dots
Let a review status kick off your dot's next revision: an OpenAI video team's edit-review loop
OpenAI's Brent Schooley says a launch video was edited entirely in the cloud by his dot. Each time the reviewer set an edit to "Feedback Ready" in their internal review app, the dot picked up the notes and started the next cut on its own. The pattern works for any work that goes through rounds of hu
What changed
On Oct 22, 2026, Brent Schooley (developer video at OpenAI, @chefbrent) shared that the Decisions API launch video posted by Romain Huet was edited entirely in the cloud with HyperFrames and coordinated by his dot. The team's internal review app, Cutroom, has a status dropdown on each revision. When Romain finished reviewing an edit and set it to "Feedback Ready", the dot noticed, read the feedback, and kicked off a new revision without anyone handing the notes over. Brent described it as edit, then review, then edit again, run by the dot and the review app. Romain replied that the loop took only a couple of minutes of his feedback. Brent also said he has the model analyze the footage first to pick the best takes, which he thinks helps the quality of the cuts.
Who is affected
People who already use a dot for work that goes through repeated rounds of human review, such as video edits, design drafts, docs, or landing pages. It matters most when the slow part is passing notes back and forth, not the work itself.
What to do now
- Pick one clear signal that a review round is done, such as a status field, a label, or a checkbox in the tool your reviewer already uses. Don't rely on the dot guessing from free-form comments.
- Ask your dot to watch for that signal, read only the feedback attached to that revision, produce the next revision, and set the status back to "in review" so the reviewer knows a new cut is ready.
- Have the dot do the prep work before the first draft (for video, ranking takes and noting the best ones), so each round starts from better material.
- Keep a human as the one who sets the "ready" status and the final approval. The loop speeds up the rounds; it doesn't replace the reviewer.
What is not confirmed
This is a field report from OpenAI staff about an internal tool, and it hasn't been independently verified. Cutroom is not a public product, and Brent didn't share how the dot watches the status (a schedule, a webhook, or something else), what permissions it has, or how many rounds the video took. He called it "a very light test", and HyperFrames' fit for heavier edits is still unclear; he said he has used DaVinci Resolve for more ambitious projects.
Sources
- Brent Schooley on X: https://x.com/chefbrent/status/2113373509162271202
- Brent Schooley, edit-review loop reply: https://x.com/chefbrent/status/2113373785482993888
- Brent Schooley, "Feedback Ready" dropdown: https://x.com/chefbrent/status/2113392399162445932
- Romain Huet reply: https://x.com/romainhuet/status/2113415295985725660
- The video itself (Decisions API GA post): https://x.com/romainhuet/status/2113369156838121938
Sources
- OfficialBrent Schooley on X · Oct 22, 2026
- OfficialBrent Schooley, "Feedback Ready" dropdown · Oct 22, 2026
- OfficialThe video itself (Decisions API GA post) · Oct 22, 2026
- OfficialBrent Schooley, edit-review loop reply
- OfficialRomain Huet reply
Get updates like this every morning
- ① Email
- ② Card on Stripe
- ③ 7 days free
Then $2/month · cancel anytime in one click